|
|
-
- Date: 11 Nov 2011
-
Time: 15:00:00
-
Remote User: # 2011-20142*
Comments :
CHINA'S ECONOMICAL SUCCESS STORY; China is a deep rooted Socially Cultured Nation, a type of nation that find its Economical and Political history parallel to that of the presently Economical and Political Developing Nations who are in trouble Economically and Politically.
With that experiences, China find itself to be one of the few new world leading nations in a position with flexible fruitful communication skills with the developing nations.
One of China's key strategy towards a developing nation relationship is their ideology of respecting a nation social and religious culture. This natural instinct of the
Chinese came by their being, (A) Majority in one religion (B)
Extremely few in citizens with none-Chinese ethnic-cultural background and (C) "Shadow-Democracy"; A Democracy system being monitor within Communism, Socialism or Social-Democracy System.
Does this " Shadow-Democracy" really works ?, only if a country is in the same status as (A) above, along with (B) and (C) status.
China has the most common sense strategy as A, B,& C in the field of bridging business contracts with nations richer or poor. They do not
interfere with any country internal political system's structure nor their religious believes.
This earned them a good reputation of good relationship among many countries, which led to businesses in Trading, Investments, Banking, Assist in nation infrastructure building, social relationship and most of all TRUST.
These few economical strategies are major political components towards any nations economical success. Every nation needs help whether rich or poor and as complicated as it may be, the solution is how to approach the subject matter.
China practices these as a strategy of noble gesture to other nations, specifically with the developing nations who are also looking for security of all faces, this also led the
Chinese into world Economical Successfulness and in return built a trustful business relationship with the rich in raw natural materials developing nations, who are the world future economical development hope.
The world eyes are now widely open like the sun, and neo-colonization ; the economical safe heaven strategy of other nations that prey
on the developing nations as a man made unpredictable economical
cancer machine or parasite eating of a nations economical and
political progress will not be tolerated and which never worked.
Seemingly, it will take a change of foreign policy and respect between nations, to bridge Peace Politically, Economically and Socially.
Should incase Democracy's
definition may need to be redefine, then the question is,
" If Democracy's Reputation is being ruin by Capitalism while
Capitalism is a component of Democracy, then Democracy will never be wholly-free ".
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 21 Mar 2011
-
Time: 19:07:24
-
Remote User:
# 2011-20124*
Comments:
Certainly the world is at war
with its self. It may not appear in the mind or in the eyes of others as
so, but in realty this global tension is intensifying and threaten the
average world wide individual security and safety. My opinion to world
peaceful solution is for The United Nations Organizations may have to
examine its members Political Systems, for the sake of their civilians
if it fits as a system that serves-applies to human rights. Unless we
want to wait for another "NO-FLY-ZONE" act which costs human lives. A
world without a peace maker is a world of no tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 21 Mar 2011
-
Time: 18:06:58
-
Remote User:
# 2011-20123*
Comments:
Are we better now or worse in
the world today ? With high tech "Risky-Technology" in place of our
lives, such as Nuclear Weapons for killing humans, Nuclear Energy
Plants, Synthetic Medications and Synthetic Food without Good Bacteria.
These examples are few of many which shows us our deficiency in our
morality and questions if we are in danger to our selves or if we are
our own nightmare. I believe we humans have not reach the highest point
of our integrity yet, though we may think we are closer. However, my
opinion is to the world leading organizations to stage a strong rules
and regulations, to at list come up with a good effective
Safety-Contingency plans towards each such matters, which at list will
help alleviate to safety ness
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 10 Mar 2011
-
- Time: 10:05:32
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20122*
Comments :
The unveilings of the once Colonial-Ruling Success Stories is
naturally unearth in the Middle-East and Africa. The most unrest nations
on earth today are the one time colonized nations, specifically Africa
and the Middle-East, these nations natural Social-Democracy rulings was
broken into a compound fractured Politically, Socially and Economically
state of mind under colonization. Almost all of those nations were left
with if not colonial system, colonial modernized system at list were
left in neo-colonization state; ( A hidden system which pronounces a
country as totally independent country, yet politically and economically
broken and depend on either the previous colonial government or other
countries ). Research tells us those one time colonized nations were one
time structured politically, economically and socially in the best of
their interest within their own sovereign geographical area. Later their
nations were boarded as nations in to one country and colonial system
was imposed upon them without carefully examining weather those system
will be in their best interest. The result was Coup d'e tat, military
rule and foreign systems which never worked up till now. So the question
is how do we help solve these instability among the developing
countries. When you already have in place a system within a nation that
work for that nation , it will be a mistake to prejudge them or set them
under foreign system-rule. Certain political system work for groups
settled in one area not related to each other or unknown to each other
culture and the same political system may not work for groups who are
related to each other culturally in one geographical area. Supposed to
be independent countries who are approximately 10 to 50 years old are in
"Stale-mate" or "Check-mate" politically and economically. These nations
will need Re-structuring help from the United Nations Organizations to
help eliminate today's and future chaos politically, economically and
socially. Talking to a nation leaders within a country and not just the
government will help. |
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 02 Mar 2011
-
- Time: 05:02:09
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20121*
Comments :
Diplomacy can prevent bloodshed, diplomacy can prevent economical
and political chaos and certainly not only diplomacy can prevent war but
can prevent global tension. Acceptable and unacceptable political
systems in certain countries has been known to the world for sometime,
yet they were engaged economically and politically with the world
community in many businesses. Can the diplomacy that was applied with
those countries in maintaining businesses, this time be converted into a
sensible diplomacy to enable countries practice a system with 100% human
rights. For the sake of innocent civilian lives world wide, the world
community can not allow an uprising from one or two countries to be turn
into world wide uprising among nations. In today's world, if the world
community can not peacefully solve an internal economical and political
conflict within a country, then we as humans are incompetent within our
lives and just living as individuals or leaders without foresight
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 23 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 18:20:15
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20120*
Comments:
What is going on in the world
today is the evidence of world leadership Failure. This world leadership
failure runs from certain nations who claimed to be practicing
Democracy, along with Social-Democracy, Socialist, Communism, Monarchy
and even Religious-rules. Most of these rulers are of a Wolf in a Sheep
skin type. Some of the world government functions in a negative manner,
those governments think their nation's public should work for them,
instead of that government serving their nations people. From my
research result, most citizens in most countries survive on their own
without any government assistance. The saddest thing is that after these
poor people struggle to established their own mini businesses with their
own capital, their government collect business fee from them. The old
mafia style. The most shameful thing is that after a government profit
from their national products, the citizens of that nation is left out.
These little or major disadvantages is what create national and global
economical chaos ,crime and which also instigates toppling of a
government. Upon all said above, does the United Nations Organization
have a program whereby they supervise HUMANE activities in each country.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 20 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 18:51:12
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20119
Comments:
I personally think that the UN's effort in ensuring world peace
has not been effective over the years. Indeed, a carefully analysis of
world situation clearly points to the fact that there is more chaos in
the world today than it used to be. The UN with it seemingly unlimited
resources continue to fail in its primary objective of ensuring world
peace. Reasons are as follows: 1. I simply cannot mention even one
situation that peace has been brokered in any war tone country. Iraq is
still being torn into pieces and people continue to die each day. One
may ask, where is the UN? 2. Palestine and Israel have been fighting for
decades now and very little is said about UN. The most recent is the
issue in Egypt. Dozens of people lost their lives in their fight for
democracy in the middle east country. The ordinary people in Egypt
fought for themselves without looking to the UN for intervention.
Indeed, the UN would not have succeeded anyway. We could say similar
thing about Libya and other countries. 2. In situations where the UN
attempts to make their presence felts, they wait a bit too long by which
time too much damage has been caused. This for me defeats their primary
objective of ensuring a peaceful co-existence. May be there is the need
to look critically at the modus operandi of the UN. They should be more
spontaneous in their fight for world peace. I believe they could do
better than they have done in the past and I believe strongly that they
have what it takes to make impact in world affairs.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 19 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 13:05:09
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20118*
Comments:
When a leadership become questionable its reliability become
less-trustful. I believe the United Nations Organization is doing the
best they can, but they are not standing firmly for the world civilians,
members can only be less criticize as a Nation only if that Nation
registered their Nation as their personal property, which never happen.
In my utmost opinion to the United Nations Organization, all member
Nations and non-member Nations political system should be re-evaluated
under Humane and Human Rights Laws, this I strongly believe will abolish
neo-colonization practices in certain countries by their country
leaders. |
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 15 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 08:12:35
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20117*
Comments:
This is the moment when the United
Nations Organization is to seize the opportunity to voice out to the
world, addressing the world leaders to practice "Decency of Ethics".
Beating drums in a closed doors not only impair the drummer's hearing
but the message from the drums is not heard outside that closed doors.
|
|
|
|
|
- Date: 11 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 12:47:44
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20116*
Comments:
CONGRATULATIONS ! THE EAGLE IS
RESURRECTED.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 06 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 01:27:14
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20115*
Comments:
The concern is; before any
country or nation join the united nations organization, shouldn't their
political and social structure be examine first under a common human
rights law. I believe this will help bring awareness in practicing
goodness in humanity. Political system has many faces, yet this
different system faces can be best practice in a harmony without any
special label to a nation. Under Justice, Freedom and Peace, without
discriminations of believe, race, profession, sex or even a
monarchy-system. However, all of these political system differences
within certain nations is to be decided by the people of that nation.
Human rights practices in each nation under freedom and respect makes
one sleep soundly.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 01 Feb 2011
-
- Time: 03:51:11
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20114*
Comments:
The events in our world today
Feb.1st 2011 has become an introduction to a test of a new World Order.
The true integrity of the human mind is at a test.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 31 Jan 2011
-
- Time: 23:29:46
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20113
Comments:
The small group of people that
control the globe.....allow the UN too little power.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 27 Jan 2011
-
- Time: 11:00:53
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20112
Comments:
Well, they do not seem to be very
effective at it. Sometimes it seems they are an extension of the
very powers they may--and increasingly--have to thwart. It would
be ideal if the UN weren't so beholden to the great powers; i.e.
if it were more neutral. For then its moderating influence would
be far greater. Also, the UN should try to be less bureaucratic,
and more streamlined, agile, so as to adapt better to issue and
conflict resolution. I realize it is an organization like any
other but, I think, with a more 'consistent' vision outlined for
it and a more fair performance, the organization itself would be
more enthusiastic and more adept at fulfilling its mission. In
other words the UN itself is comprised of people, and if its
performance is fairer and more consistent, its lofty goals would
not fail to energize its people to in turn make it perform
better. Commonsense after all. I must end on this note: that
though I think the UN is largely ineffective, I see no other
organization that can play the role it was designed to play.
Hence I am not advocating for dismantling it, merely suggesting
that it needs to be radically overhauled.
|
|
|
|
|
-
- Date: 26 Jan 2011
-
- Time: 20:22:29
-
- Remote User: # 2011-20111*
Comments:
I believe it will take Communication, compromise and simple respect
towards one another. If one intentionally choose not to give a simple
opinion as a freedom of speech toward world peaceful solution, then he
or she should not complain when the world become a trouble place to be
in. Somebody tell me if I am wrong.
|
|
|